Tacitia 的个人资料[--Tacit Oath--]照片日志列表更多 工具 帮助
10月26日

-

最强有力的悲哀并不是生命的无意义。
而是寻求生命意义这一无意义的行为。

语言是进化的产物。
意义是语言的附属品。
语言是有趣的,有用的,使人进入更丰盛而复杂的状态。
(你看这句话。有趣,有用,丰盛,复杂。它们位于一个层次里,尽管又处在不同的次层上。然而有一样东西是和它们处于完全不同的层次里。无法表述。那是      )
然而语言也是枷锁。

意义与生命并不存在于世界的同一个层次上,因此也无法建立两者间的关系。所有的尝试都只对生命在语言中的投影起作用。
如果层次这种东西真的存在的话。



10月22日

-

藤蔓攀附于暗灰石砖之上,正红的妖娆,如玫瑰花瓣,胭脂红墙。秋风过,似情人眼波婉转缭绕。却是在行将凋零时。
10月21日

近日的小感慨……

1. Why I have read more algorithms in AI field in the Intro to Cognitive Science class in Cornell than I did in my Intro to AI class.
2. Python is so messy. Does it have the distinguish between public and private field?
3. Why the zero degree days in Cornell feel much warmer than those in SH.
4. Java's iterator is much easier to use however I still prefer the c++ way.
5. I should spend two dedicated weeks reading in English, anything will do.
6. 7 hours away from the compiler class. Totally unprepared yet. When can I finish my cognitive science reading...
10月16日

-

从一种死亡纵身跃入另一种死亡。
所求不过是一瞬间的轻盈。

卢郁佳给她的书起了个很矫情的名字。
但是故事是再好不过的了。

Is it mortality that defines humanity?
All the stories about immortal creatures are far from what they could be like.

10月7日

-

在南方糜颓的春,温润的秋和湿冷的冬天里待久了,不会去想起北方的秋。
然而当黄叶铺天盖地的时候,那一瞬场景呼唤血液里深藏的记忆。
风从最高的枝干上奔腾而过的声音。整棵树都欢喜的颤栗。色彩斑斓的交响乐。金黄色红色青绿色的是叶。棕黄色玻璃灰色的是风。蓝灰色的是天空。还有偶尔降临轻盈舞蹈的金色阳光。
每一片草叶,每一根藤蔓,每一丛灌木,每一株乔木都一同歌唱。
飞翔的落叶。在重力还不足以将其拉落至地面的时刻,在衰老与死亡还不能够俘获其灵魂的时刻,尽情的狂欢着。
草地上绵密的一层层的波纹。流动向四面八方。
周遭的一切都是动荡的。原始的真诚的狂野的年复一年的风的韵律,充斥了天地,涟漪一样荡开去。将你裹卷进去,身不由己。可是谁又会想逃开呢,面对最自由的束缚。


10月6日

-

Human are unreliable machines, cause we are always trying to figure out why we want to do what we want to do. That screws everything up.

People argue that emotional impulse and confusion are the most precious and fun part of being human.
Yes it is fun. Only when you want it.

So don't try to manipulate yourself. If you two stay in parallel things will be just fine. If you try yourself will first manipulate you.

The above sentense is seemingly nonsense yet you may be tempted to think it has deep meaning. The truth is the producer of that sentence have no idea whether the sentense has meaning or not. Yet no one know what is a truth, who is the producer or what is meaning.


结束了。
广阔无垠的舞台里,时间是最初的最后的唯一的舞者。

偶然。随机。所有这些词都冰入骨髓,如海水,如死亡。
却也有人视为恩赐甘霖,如火焰,如爱欲。
不过因结果而异。

所以说这个世界只不过再一次用事实告诉我real world是很不美好的= =!

来者恒来,去者恒去。


Can you display computer-like intelligence?

There used to be a test inspired by Turing Test, in which each human judge talks to a computer program and a human, then tries to guess which is human and which is computer. However in this test, it is not computer trying to display human intelligence, but the human trying to pretend to be a computer program.

Following are some excerpts. 1) and 2) are the same judge talking to computer and human respectively. In 1) the judge (a philosophy graduate student) is interacting with a MATLAB Command Window, and in 2) with a neurobiology undergrad. In 3) is an interaction between a psychology graduate student judge and Elman's simple recurrent network.

1) Judge: Why
    MATLAB: R.T.F.M.
    Judge: What does that mean?
2) Judge: Why
    Human: Why what?
    Judge: You're definitely a human.
3) Judge: Would
     SRN: you
     Judge: please
     SRN: stop
    Judge: anticipating
    SRN: my
    Judge: every
    SRN: word!


-- From Connection Science, Vol 12, No.1, 2000